The way I read the sentence: "Scientists discovered that the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology can treat sickle cell disease by editing bone marrow cells to produce a different kind of hemoglobin" was that scientists made the discovery by editing the cells, not that the technology edited the cells. How do you recommend making the distinction clearer for myself?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
The way I read the sentence: "Scientists discovered that the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology can treat sickle cell disease by editing bone marrow cells to produce a different kind of hemoglobin" was that scientists made the discovery by editing the cells, not that the technology edited the cells. How do you recommend making the distinction clearer for myself?