I'm interested and just sent you a DM with my name + contact info. Thanks!

Count me in!

Wow, I had never thought about the adrenaline part but that's a great point. I have no doubt that for so many people, the LSAT-Flex taking place in the controlled, familiar environment of one's home really helps to reduce test anxiety and improve performance. But OP, I think I'm in the same boat as you; I love the adrenaline rush and the acute pressure brought on when the high stakes are palpable. I really think that it makes me read faster, think sharper, and perform better. Too bad that I can't replicate that feeling while taking the LSAT at my desk.

If cost isn't a relevant discussion here (I'm assuming that means that you'd be able to attend this school totally debt-free), then I think your career ambitions are something to consider.

If I were you, I'd take a really close look at the school's employment data to see if the school has a solid track record of placing graduates into:

A. the region you want to work in &

B. the type of legal job you want to have.

If the answer is no to either of those, then I would definitely consider taking the LSAT and applying to other schools next cycle that may be a better fit.

i'm so sorry that i have nothing to contribute to this but i just needed to say that i love your pic + username so much

I find this question to be extremely challenging. I think what really trips me up here is Marife saying that the film "violated a requirement of murder mysteries." My mind immediately thought "OK, if X fails to meet a requirement for Category A, then X can not belong to Category A." So I thought that Marife & Nguyen actually agreed that the film shouldn't be considered a murder mystery. Did anyone else have this problem?

#help (Added by Admin)

Congratulations! You earned it :)

I think that "untenable on its own terms" is just a verbose way of saying that it's invalid/weak/ineffective in its current form.