User Avatar
dionfarganis511
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
dionfarganis511
Saturday, Aug 10 2013

Thanks. I'm thinking in particular about Dinos, which I know was a bit of an aberration. But it "reads" more naturally as an overfunded grouping game, or whatever the name of that categorization is that the mainstream companies use. 7 items for 5 spots. You've shown how much easier it is as an I/O, but if you have a second, can you go back and re-read the setup through the eyes of someone who hasn't seen it before, and share what would tip you off that it was an I/O?

0
PrepTests ·
PT134.S4.P2.Q12
User Avatar
dionfarganis511
Friday, Aug 09 2013

Q12: Doesn't the information in lines 1-3 support choice C?

2
PrepTests ·
PT134.S4.P2.Q10
User Avatar
dionfarganis511
Friday, Aug 09 2013

Q10: Line 48 says Mexican proverbs are used to transmit language. Is D wrong because it says "often"? Since it's an MSS question, I thought there was some wiggle room here (although I agree that B is stronger).

1
User Avatar

Wednesday, Jul 17 2013

dionfarganis511

Identifying In/Out games under time pressure

Taking in October. Doing great on games, and really love In/Out games. But one of my biggest concerns for test day is that I won't recognize an I/O Game as an I/O Game right away. I say this because there are a number of past games that JY runs as I/O Games (genius), but that others don't run as I/O Games because the cues aren't that obvious. When we're practicing, we usually know it's an I/O game because it's in a bundle or part of a quiz. But once or twice on prep tests, I've hit a game and only a few minutes in did I realize it was an I/O game.

This is a very long way of asking if there is a lesson that I missed, or if anyone has some good cheats, for a foolproof way to spot an I/O Game instantly.

0
PrepTests ·
PT114.S2.Q7
User Avatar
dionfarganis511
Tuesday, Jul 16 2013

I get that B is the strongest response, but just a general question: I thought we weren't supposed to attack or question premises. But here, one of the premises is that airport expansion is only warranted by an increase in traffic volume. B seems to indicate no increase in traffic volume. So for B to be right, don't we have to question (or in fact contradict) one of the premises?

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?