@manasvin4andra849 said:
@jordanjohnsonjr282 said:
You sure can: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-flex-score-converter/
Can this be used if we do only three sections on LawHub?
Yes. If you're only doing three sections, you simply enter in the number you had incorrect from each section.
If you do four, you simply check the box that says "2 LR" and enter your total missed for both LR sections.
If you're only doing three sections on LawHub, however, you may as well just enter in your answers into the PrepTest on 7sage and check off the FLEX box.
Wow, I was totally unaware of this tool. Thought I might just enter in all my answers a second time.
Thanks very much!
I took Prep Test 87 on LawHub and did all four sections. After entering my answers on 7Sage and doing Blind Review, I got my score, but I'd also like to see what my score would have been if the second LR section were discounted (i.e. if I had taken it in the FLEX format).
In my case, I think the extra section buoyed my score a bit after a tough LG (Game 4 was absurdly time-consuming).
+1 #help I believe this alternative explanation should be stickied to the top, or otherwise addressed as the more accurate reasoning behind B being correct and E being incorrect.
I am in agreement with you 100%. JY dropped the ball on this one. I think the probability indicator "unlikely" messes with our ability to think about this in statistical terms, which is the key to understanding why B is the only Sufficient Assumption among the answer choices.
Your explanation is thorough, but put more simply, the new earthquake detection system is still unlikely to be useful even if E is assumed to be true.
E says: if the system never (0.00% of the time) distinguishes between weak and strong quakes → it is unlikely to be useful.
B says: if the system does not always (anything less than 100.00%) differentiate between weak and strong quakes → it is unlikely to be useful.
Imagine a scenario wherein the system can differentiate between weak and strong quakes 1 out of 1 million times? That's not never, which means this scenario would not be covered by E, but the system is still probably not very useful.
On the other hand, B says that unless the system can successfully differentiate between weak and strong quakes every single time, it is unlikely to be useful.
B will cover every single possible scenario in the gap between the Geologist's premise and their conclusion.
This is all great news. Now, is the pens/pencil rule an "either or" rule or a "not both" rule?
Would be so helpful to create your master LG diagram in pen and then use the pencil to fill in & erase for the questions.
Congrats on the score and the progress. Can you let us know what you were scoring on sections before 7Sage? Did you make most of your games on LG?
@hwkim20211 said:
My order was LG - RC- LR
LG
ordering of student seating (maybe?)
upper and lower floors
break in at a museum
econ course w prerequisites
It was really hard mostly because it was my first section and I was really nervous. Also I kept getting the upper and lower floors mixed up in my mind. Could have been -0 could have been -5 (LMAO).
RC-
Britaain - English Pacifist
Inuit gov't in Canada
Judicial philosophy
Keystone species
Relatively easy. I thought. One question in the keystone passage that i'm still unsure about.
LR-
high sodium diets (still can't figure out the answer RIP)
Chinese dinosaurs
arson/cracked glass
I had the exact same test (i.e. in the same order, too). I thought the last game was deceptively easy.
Is there any chance they disclose this test?