Subscription pricing
Hi guys ,
I have been trying hard to improve upon my LSAT strategies for all sections and must say that have been able to do fair enough for LR and RC sections. But I am so tense as I can't happen to get most of my logic games correct. Honestly the only game I have improved is linear games, but rest all I tend to mess up in my head always, and even if I were to get it right I would take so much time that I would just be able to get through one of all 4. Please help I need serious advice on how to get hold of different types and master them. Your input is seriously appreciated. Thanks
Hi J.Y.
This is in regards to q17 on section2 of diagnostic LSAT (june 2007). I am afraid I would definitely get this wrong coz as far as we know we never attack the premise while proving any flaw in reasoning the conclusion based on that.
Isn't it that we have to agree with the premise no matter how weird it is and based on that see if the conclusion is correct or incorrect .
But here if choose B as the correct answer choice aren't we doubting that the premise is incorrect.i.e. the claim of the computer experts is incorrect because they do not have the expertise to do so. I mean we are given what they claim based on their research, so we take it as it is and not question it. We have to use the premise as is to show that how the conclusion drawn by the author is not in line with the premise. I mean that us what I understand of it.
So just help because in no way Would I get such questions correct.