It doesn't even matter that first part because we have a->b&c. If c is that it doesn't harm any portion of the population, then it doesn't matter what b is because c is already false. And if c is necessary for a (that it is acceptable to use) to occur, and c does not occur, then a cannot occur.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
It doesn't even matter that first part because we have a->b&c. If c is that it doesn't harm any portion of the population, then it doesn't matter what b is because c is already false. And if c is necessary for a (that it is acceptable to use) to occur, and c does not occur, then a cannot occur.