#help for number 17, it seems that answer choice C falsifies part of the stem. I thought that when approaching strengthening/weakening q's, we must accept all of the premises in the stem?

So, in JYs explanation of why the answer is not D, he seems to say that this is because we have no reason to assume that a limerick would be a non-artistic type of poetry.

however, im not sure that this would have worked to debunk my original reasoning for selecting D, as I inferred that we COULD assume that since earlier we are told that poetry is defined by musical characteristics of language. To me, the part that should have caused the disconnect for this answer choice would have been the specification of "art" in the description of poetry.

BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, I am confused by why answer C is the correct choice. What exactly allows us to infer that a novel that exploits meter and rhyme + art is a novel and poem, and not just a poem (since all we are told about this novel involves the criteria of a poem). what exactly makes it a novel? just the fact that we are told that it is a novel ?

#help

would "any" be considered strong or weak language? #help

any tips on how NOT to use mapping/lawgic? confused on why we keep learning/ getting explanations that depend on these strategies, yet JY here brings up the (important, seemingly true) point that this is often too time consuming. #help

this might not be the brightest question, but in the process of weakening the support, how do we distinguish this support that we are weakening with the premises which provide the support? #help