MY DAWG IS TRYING, SHE GETS THEM B'S AND B'S GET DEGREES!!

@ said:

I am in the same boat with taking the August LSAT and would also love to know what is best in regards to studying. I am a good bit of ways into the Logical Reasoning section of the v1 syllabus but if working through v2 was highly encouraged, I could be persuaded.

Otherwise, as of right now, I think I will just skip over the logic games section entirely of the v1 syllabus because I do not want to have to work all the way back through the foundations and logical reasoning of v2. However, that does somewhat worry me (at least a little bit) because up until the same point when doing a direct comparison, the v2 syllabus is different. I think blending the two might prove to be a little bit difficult and stressful and I would like to avoid making the process even more stressful (LOL).

I have this same concern.

@ said:

Hi Mary. Thank you so much for the detailed response.

I have another question... Will I miss anything by committing to LR+RC materials on V2 only?

I noticed that the titles and headings on each versions (V1 &V2) are slightly different.

I'm pretty sure JY announced that V2 has more coverage on the LR with another LR section added on the LSAT post August, 2024.

However, I just wanted to make sure that I will not be missing anything from neglecting V1.

Thank you in advance.

I also have this question

"do not necessarily suffer" in D sounded opinionated to me.

D suggests the possibility that the old vacuum might have removed more dirt overall than the Super XL, which is not addressed in the salesperson's argument. The focus is on the specific test and the Super XL picking up more dirt than the old vacuum in a single run, not a total comparison of their abilities. This is not the central flaw in the argument, because the salesperson's claim is specifically that the Super XL picked up dirt that the old vacuum left behind, not that the old vacuum removed more dirt in total.

E This is the strongest criticism. The salesperson’s argument is based on the idea that the Super XL picks up dirt that the old vacuum left behind. However, the salesperson has not ruled out the possibility that if the Super XL had been used first, it might have left behind just as much dirt as the old vacuum did. In other words, the Super XL could simply be more efficient at picking up dirt after the old vacuum has already done its work. This is a serious flaw in the argument.