damn i rly need to stop over thinking I picked D and then changed to A in Br

take the small Ws Im with you brother

nah fr shits nothing to smirk bout, i dont rly do a "low res" I just remember in my head what and where and go from there and if I rly need to ill look back at the passage. this q stumped me b/c the author mentioned implications of it and I thought the main point would mention that rip

I love the humor on these lessons kevin is great. I deadass laughed out loud when he said "maybe you insulted him on not knowing the difference between ness and stuff conditions. Great stuff keep it up kev

RC was always my downfalll so I procrastinated learning it cuz I thought I was doomed but so far I have been rocking it (thanks kevin) I hope I am able to translate the teqs to my own practice cuz kevin is super helpful in undertsanidng the passage which was my downfall

I got the answer in about 10 seconds, I wish I had kevin in my ear during the exam to explain the passage, the roadmap took me there in a second

noooo frrrr lmao, this is so ez when kevin can exlain it. I havnt gotten one wrong due to him quite literally telling us "the answer" before we even get there. My main reason I suck at RC is b/c I cant understand the passage "correctly"

you get scratch paper.... I dont reccommend diagraming tho, takes too much time I would just do footnotes... I didnt diagram on my test back in april and got a 153 and think it hurt me in the RC i will be doing it for the next one

yep, from now on if I read an AC and I think its right but not sure Ill pick it and flag the Q to come back to it. Some of these analogy Qs are rly ez without acutally reading. Match the stim con to the AC con, the stim said soley so you want an AC that is super limited which is what you have in A with the "only"

are you guys reading and watching? I was but low keu taking 30 mins per moduel is not it lol

#4 is an assumption required for the conclusion aka necc assump

Iv been rocking this whole section maybe a handful wrong but timing is off, im trying to understand it completely before moving on. What helps me especially with these principal questions is to see them at face value, do not overthink them. Dont even map them out, whatever the stim is saying will be directly corelated to the AC no need for fancy lawgic. Exp. this stim says that an organ that outlasts its body is useless, imagine a car right. lets say the motor is so strong that it outlives the transmission... the trans goes out before the motor does, so what good is that? your motor is running but the car cant get into gear and move... just like a useless thing. Now in the AC i am lookung for an option that says a componet doesnt need to be super strong or it will serve no purpose like the example I gave with the car engine. E is exactly like the situation I was talking about regardless of a car or not. Another example Ill give that doesnt pertain to cars is an iphone, lets say the made the iphone battery so strong that it doesnt die, now will all that extra battery power the screen starts to give out. Now you have a phone thats not dead but unusable b/c you cant see the screen. Hope this helps

yes thats something they need to fix up the app on the phone sucks, its slow and the formatting is wack

you can pause the vid or whatever you want. I solve these without watching first

this one got me ngl I knew it was part to whole but i was stupid and didnt pick the flaw one, I picked the one that was analogus to it cuz I didnt read the question where it said flawed ugh

A has nothing to do with another perosn or attaction to it so i moved on

ez money sub 1:20 gang

dont worry about the target tbh as long as u are around 1:30-2:00 per question you will be fine cuz you can make up time on some and use more on others. I was 1:32 which is fine by me

also knew A was right off the rip b/c of the "only" that matches to the soley in the stim meaning the ONLY way

read A right off the rip picked it in under a min, then proceeded to check everything and was done by under 2, rechecked and submitted at 2:10, I guess I dont feel comfortable moving on till Im sure its correct?? is there a way to get around this as I could of been done fast?

we slowly improving on timing, got it in 1:57. no need for diagraming, if any of you are reading this what I usally do is read it as a then b if not b then a or bla bla bla... i dont even pay attention to what the texts says i simply put it into lawgic in my head. another way to do this is replace the AC with the stims langauge as JT says. for this one I read D as if they were going on strike (he will win) he will only win if he gets water and they havwnt done that ( they will only strike if agree and they dont) so he will win (so they will strike)

this was very ez to me got it without even reading the full questions just the conlusions. The conclusion needs to have "every" needs to be strong followed by probs will. It said any which means every, then followed by problaby, it cant say most b/c most is not all.... the majority of them did not have a definiate term in the conclsuion but E.

damn, i mapped it out and changed from E to D kms

ngl iv been crushing these.... but just in 5x the amount of time i need to do it in lol... i get so caught up

holy hell this one took me a while. I thought it was C right off the rip but then when I went to map everything out I got so confused. I ended up starting from scratch to fully understand it and after 8 mins I got it right