Is there a known date yet when people taking the Nov. flex will pick what day/time they take the exam?

I just registered for November and was still prompted to pick a testing center, so I'm curious how picking a day/time works.

I don't think it is possible, although I could be wrong.

What I've been doing is creating a problem set of the LR section that was skipped on the exam

@ Thank you! I've been PTing between 157 and 163, my last PT before the exam was number 87, with a 161. My point fluctuations mostly stem from LG and RC performance. I was aiming for anywhere between those numbers, but of course wanted to break into the 160s.

@ I would say so. For sure felt more like 70s/80s LR sections. And thank you!!

Hi everyone! I just completed my exam my order was LR (26), LG (23) and RC (27)

LR topics that I can remember were about some sort of dinosaur claw and climbing prey, and a study about fat and walnuts in a diet study---I'm blanking on any other topics. Nothing to crazy to note, very much a LR section. Depending on what question types appear, and the degree of difficulty of that question type is what causes the most fluctuation for me here.

LG-- had one about paintings and sculpture and another about buildings being built on campus. The games were what you expect. If any points were lost here is was because of my nerves, but overall was a solid section for me! Nothing that made me want to pull my hair out!

RC-- normal RC experience, nothing to out of left field, but I myself usually do best on the hardest RC sections. I had something about ocublits? ocbliets? idk I can't spell, and it was about chemistry and physics. There was also one about tech in the courtroom, and weaving looms.

Overall for me I'd say this test was standard, (considering I took the oh so lovely pt 88 last September though anything would be better than THAT experience) (also for a laugh, my cat died 2 days before that LSAT, and one of the games topics was on puppies, and you guessed it kittens, the LSAT gods know no bounds)

Good luck to everyone else taking the exam in the coming hours/days! :)

88 was a bit of a beast games wise to say the least, (and for sure can be considered a worst case scenario in my opinion) and the RC was pretty up there difficulty wise. It also has one of the largest amount of questions you could get wrong and still score a 170 in recent years.

My method was to do every other problem set. For me, I did not feel as fatigued, and still felt I had enough exposure to the question type before moving onto the next one. It also left me with problem sets I could go back to for question types that I needed to practice more.

Hello! Just completed my exam! My experience was very smooth! No issues to be found and my proctor was super sweet and supportive.

My sections were LR(25) -- LG (23) -- RC (27)

LR--- I'm pretty sure the LR I took was the experimental I took during a previous real exam (I'm not sure if I can say the exam it was from). Overall nothing to awful, and was pretty standard.--Edit just kidding a topic was similar but was NOT the experimental I took. Topics were Jurors and tech, aloe vera, and Trex turbinates

LG -- Again standard nothing out of left field that I found, but I did let nerves overrun me this section so I'm thinking I did around -5 to -7 (my average is -3). But again any perception of difficulty was from my brain being nervous. I can only remember movie theaters as one topic, the rest is a blur.

RC -- I can see where some people might find the reading of this section to be hard. The topics I had were humans walking, value theory, and silk worms. RC is generally my better section (I can go -4 on a good day, -8 on a bad) and I think it was honestly standard in relation to the LR and LG sections that were in my exam.