User Avatar
ericttien513
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
ericttien513
Monday, May 09 2022

I am interested.

0
User Avatar
ericttien513
Friday, Apr 08 2022

I made this discord for NYers!

https://discord.gg/KMhGBPsD

1
User Avatar
ericttien513
Friday, Mar 25 2022

Willing to meet in Brooklyn? I live in Bay Ridge

0
User Avatar

Thursday, Mar 10 2022

ericttien513

NYC Discord Study Group August 2022

Hey!

I'm looking to make a small discord study group for 5-10 New Yorkers who are already scoring above +165 on practice exams, are shooting for a 175 on the August 2022 LSAT, and plan to study most weekday evenings and at least one day over the weekend.

I'm hoping we can provide each other with social support, accountability, and help with analyzing hard questions. After the test we can all celebrate together.

DM me if you're interested.

0
PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q21
User Avatar
ericttien513
Friday, Dec 03 2021

I see your way of thinking about it, but I don't understand why we can ignore the "only" considering this is the LSAT and we pay attention to sufficient/necessity relationships.

What is the difference between causal and conditional language though?

Wouldn't "A is brought about by B" be conditional language too?

0
PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q21
User Avatar
ericttien513
Wednesday, Dec 01 2021

Sorry I was mistaken with the if and only if.

But in the stimulus, doesn't"a given political structure is brought about only be certain ecological or climatic factors"translate to this:

A Given Political Structure --> Certain Ecological or Climatic Factor

In the video, it seems like he's describing it the other way around, as in "a certain factor will always lead to a certain political structure."

0
PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q21
User Avatar
ericttien513
Saturday, Nov 20 2021

Doesn't the premise say that Political Structure Ecological/Climate Factors? Isn't it "if and only if"?

This explanation feels inaccurate to me.

#help (Added by Admin)

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?