Hello, could I please join the group? My username is Erika_56053, or could I get a link to join?

I would like to join as well

I feel like AC E makes many more assumptions than AC A. I still dont understand how "going to daycare" means more exposure to germs. I assumed that at daycare the teachers take better care of kids than parents who are busy and need to send those kids to daycare. idk I don't have kids !

SKIP

Finding this question a month after the titanic sub implosion.

https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/12/zone6ixfootball_263845960_275030384592739_1354652885828253766_n-1.jpg

Hi, I am not the best at explaining but I will try my best to explain my reasoning.

I chose answer choice E because the argument says; Students liked those teachers that had certain personality trait which was found in 20% of general public but only 5% of teachers, concluding that something out there is discouraging those people that would be likable teachers (because they possess the personality trait) from becoming teachers. We have to weaken the reasoning and answer choice E weakens it by mentioning that it is NOT the case that something discourages people from becoming teachers but actually people with that certain personality trait become teachers but they are more likely to quit.

Answer choice C does not weaken the argument, we do not know if the the students of the teachers with the personality trait also have the personality trait or are likely to develop it, and even if they did, this answer choice would, if anything, strengthen, not weaken, the argument by mentioning that in fact there is something out there that prevents these students from becoming teachers (getting recruited for other jobs).