Interested!

160! God willing!

Interested as well. Taking both!

Interested! I am taking both exams!

I'd love to join too!

I'm interested as well!

This one was tough ngl

I thought "several" was ambiguous. I learned that in "Foundational Concepts - Formal Logic Practice: Quiz - Quantifier Translations" on Question 2.

In the video, J.Y. states that "several just means some".

The information I'm learning is contradicting itself. Do I translate "several" as "some" or is it "ambiguous", according to that lesson.

I would really appreciate feedback. I am very confused.

#help

#feedback

Thanks for clarifying this!

#feedback

Would love to know about this as well.

I am interested as well!

#feedback

Question 5

Why is the rule for #5 "intent-misrep → wrong" instead of "wrong → intent-misrep"? Shouldn't we follow the order of the statement since there's no sort of conditional indicator within the first clause? I am confused.

Or is it arbitrary?

#feedback

For #8, there appears to be a grammatical error. It says:

"I'm not a doctor, so if you come to me for something that ails you, I will not deny you treatment but I also will got give you treatment."

I think by "got" it means to say "not".

#help

For #7, I am confused as to whether I have to kick certain modifiers into the domain in a specific order? The way I did #7 was like this:

Domain: Westeros + coop+ farm + Reach + DC by Tyrells

operate -> PT Gold or grain

/PT Gold or Grain -> /operate

Please let me know if there is a certain order I have to follow or if it does not matter. Thank you!

#feedback

Hi Mary! I forgot to mention that I also noticed on question 4 it says:

"Via the contrapositive, we can see that if something is not programmed to ensure the safety or its passengers "

I think that it is meant to say "of" rather than "or".

Also for question 6, it says at the end of the prompt:

"Even a center that has less than 10% adoption rate will may be eligible if it has an interactive website."

I'm not sure if the word "will or "may" is the intended word, but I know one is probably not supposed to be there.

Anyways, thank for fixing the prior grammar error and thank your assistance!

#feedback

In the answer for question #1, it says that the conditional indicator is "only is" rather than "only if". Just wanted to point that out.

Hi! I did it the other way around. I'd really appreciate your help. Pretty much, I did /B -> R -> A -> /S first and contraposed to S -> /A -> /R -> B. Why is this wrong? Please let me know if you can. Thank you!

I think so too. They will probably fix this some day.

I am interested as well! Need a group like this.

By valid I think they mean that it is in an argument format, not that it is necessarily sound.

I'm like V2 a bit more than V1 at the moment. I feel like I am truly starting to understand a bit more regarding the basics. I hope that V2 will truly help me for LR. Thank you for this version I am really enjoying it.

I am interested as well. I'd love to be apart of this group!

I'd love to join as well!