Hi! I'm looking for a study partner. I’m aiming for 170+ on the January LSAT, but studying alone can be difficult at times. Like many others, I work a 9-to-5 job, so my study time is limited. I can meet once or twice a week in the evening, and our sessions can focus on tackling challenging questions from PTs.
I had similar thoughts about A. I justified eliminating it because I assumed that the scientists altering the DNA were intervening with nature. However, this line of thinking is based on my own prior knowledge and experience rather than relying on what is presented in the passage. I’m not sure if that’s the correct way to approach the question, but I hope that helps.
Interested!