Self-study
Why can we infer that the Antibiotics group cannot have all 3 treatments in from Rule #1?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-4
faridkachra638
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
faridkachra638
Friday, Feb 12 2016
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-16-section-1-game-1/
In this video around the 1:46 mark it appears JY is representing the relationship as a biconditional. I agree with your single conditional translation. The way I came up with S-->/Y is group 4, negate necessary, and the or in the sufficient can be split up to make S-->/Y and W-->/Y.
PT16-S1-G1, trying to setup the rules with conditionals and having a bit of an issue trying to figure out why Rule 3 " Neither S nor W can be added to the same class as Y" is a biconditional for S-Y and S-W instead of just a single conditional. Biconditionals are either/or/but not both and I cannot for the the life of me back that out from this conditional statement. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I can work out S-->/Y based on group 4 negate necessary but that's all........
The nice catch was by you.... Pointing out that note in pink that I missed. I have spent the last 2 days trying to figure this out!!!! Thanks for your help.