I think the key is to clear the relation between projectile and Eurasian. The human-made projectile shows no similarity of Eurasians artifacts near North American.
A says the projectile found does not resemble any were used in Eurasia, thus, no matter near or far from North America, it can not be concluded that the first settlers came from a more distant area part of Eurasia.
BE no relate to projectile, CD no weaken the conclusion.
I am planning to take the Nov test, study in the early morning before I go to work recently, want to join you~
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I think the key is to clear the relation between projectile and Eurasian. The human-made projectile shows no similarity of Eurasians artifacts near North American.
A says the projectile found does not resemble any were used in Eurasia, thus, no matter near or far from North America, it can not be concluded that the first settlers came from a more distant area part of Eurasia.
BE no relate to projectile, CD no weaken the conclusion.