Okay, thank you.

I would not be worried then

PDF should keep the format and be read the same. Did you try that?

They better not delay it

I have things to do and places to be (sleeping at home) lol

I had lines on mine on the September LSAT and I was admitted

I had lines on mine on the September LSAT and I was admitted

Touché everyone. Time to cram in for Saturday when I am taking the LSAT...

The sequencing-grouping chart games

Is it a good sign?

:smile:

I've almost always been good on time, just when I first started I had issues.

On the September LSAT I took I kept my nerves and did everything and went back to some questions, so that I hope will come through again. Should I focus on timed tests then or untimed to ensure I get them right? Then BR them.

Thank you!!!

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 said:

@katrakkade441 said:

And what do I need to foolproof? I have PTs 52-71 I think

You can foolproof any games. You need at least 4 maybe up to 10 clean copies of each game. There is a video on it. Most people foolproof 1-35 to save later tests for PTing.

I'm not sure what gains you'll get from foolproofing for two weeks. I think one month is about the minimum to completely foolproof games and three is more realistic. It ultimately depends on the person.

That said, it obviously starts making you better at games before you are all the way to perfect. So you might see some returns in two weeks.

Finally, a brief note on this being your last opportunity to take it.

Obviously, I can't evaluate your personal reasons for not being able to take after December. But let's talk about how compelling they must be. Let's say you get a 165 in December. Let's further say that in June or September you could get a 170 or 172 if you studied hard in the interim. You could likely get a full tuition scholarship (at least $150,000) at the school you would have just barely got into with the 165. Or alternatively you could go to a school whose degree you consider $150,000 more valuable than the school you would apply to with the 165. I'm not going to say there are not personal reasons against waiting that are that compelling(there nearly certainly are), but there are can't be many. I imagine you are best positioned to know if yours is one of these rare cases, but wanted to be sure you appreciate the stakes.

I understand completely. I did evaluate those stakes but it is one of those rare cases. Any other advice moving forward?

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 said:

Personally, I've seen great value in doing specific question types and doing timed sections.

Please elaborate, what do I do specifically?

And what do I need to foolproof? I have PTs 52-71 I think

165

I cannot take it past this December for personal reasons, it is my last and best time

How long would it take? Is it feasible with two weeks before the test (two weeks is what I’d have left after finishing the CC)

@katrakkade441 said:

@katrakkade441 said:

A professor of mine who talks with other admission officers, I think it was Stanford, told me one of Stanford's admission people said 9/10 people who apply with a 180 LSAT and 4.0 GPA do not get accepted, with more people being accepted with lower GPAs/LSATs (170 max) because they have the everything else. Any thoughts?

I'm extremely sceptical that that's true. It sounds like urban myth to me. The available data paints a totally different picture. It's self reported data but take this for instance: http://users.lawschoolnumbers.com/gpa-4/lsat-180

this is a small sample size though. very small

sorry, to clarify it's those without really strong letters of recommendation or experiences.

The Stanford officer person said lower GPA/LSAT scores than a 4.0/180, with strong everything else, are more likely to be admitted

A professor of mine who talks with other admission officers, I think it was Stanford, told me one of Stanford's admission people said 9/10 people who apply with a 180 LSAT and 4.0 GPA do not get accepted, with more people being accepted with lower GPAs/LSATs (170 max) because they have the everything else. Any thoughts?

how much is gpa a factor?

Hey so going through the LR CC so far, it looks like I did not understand most theories or concepts when I took the LSAT. I had studied with Kaplan for three - four months and it did nothing except I guess just expose me to what is what if that makes sense. So assume I know nothing. Is a 165 still unreasonable? I am a hard studier and have the work ethic etc and time for the next month