User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Wednesday, Jan 30 2019

Soooooo funny.

I have a totally similar experience. I took this past November LSAT in Toronto. I made sure I was super prepared. Like super, super, super prepared. To the point of re-checking my zip lock baggy an absurd amount of times. Morning rolls round and you're girl is UP AND ADAM. After a 35 minute train ride and a 10 minute subway ride, my last leg of the journey was a 10 minute walk to the testing centre. A couple minutes into my walk, from the corner of my eye, I see a Starbucks. My knees fall weak for that Signature Blonde Roast. I check my phone and see that I have about 30 minutes until 8:30am. I like to say that this is the point in my story where things unravel. Perhaps the start of the end.

With coffee in hand, it is 8:10 and I have 20 minutes to get to the testing centre. No problem. Finally, I arrive at the specified George Street location all with 13 minutes to spare. But, to my horror, I am face to face with a small tattoo parlour. Heart rate picks up. Where's my fellow LSAT brethren? Empty street. Weird vibes. Something is not right. With a shanking hand I pull out my ticket, only to read that I am to arrive at a testing centre on St. George Street. I am at George Street. The saints have cursed me. I Google Maps my proximity to St.George Street. A 10 minute drive. My heart rate is blasting through the roof at this point and I engage in squirrel-like thinking. No cabs around. No time to wait for an uber. Look, there is a man with a van! I approach said man in full sprint. I can tell he senses the crazy in my eye but I do not care. Sir, I don't know you but please drive me across town to a testing centre on St. George Street... (eyes fill with tears)...the doors will close in ten minutes and I have been studying for months. He is reluctant; he says that he works for a company that picks-up and drops-off wheelchair users and is on a tight schedule. My eye begins to twitch. For reasons unknown, he agrees and lets me into his unmarked van. It has no seats and no seat belts. With eyes glued to the clock, I stand straight as a pencil. Two minutes into the drive he politely asks me if I could..like...sit down or something. My rigidness is probably creeping him out. I nod empathetically. Our eyes lock in the rear view mirror as I assume a crouched frog-like position on his van floor. I begin to pray to father time. Like the boss I knew he would be, this man drives in street-style race mode. I arrive at the testing centre with legitimately one minute to spare. I thank this stranger, my saving grace. Also, like you, I scored 5 points below my average scoring range and just took the January LSAT.

Tip 1: don't give into Starbucks if time is of the essence.

Tip 2: Read the address of your testing centre with the same criticality as you would a reading comprehension passage.

Tip 3: I highly would not recommend it but, perhaps, there are situations that warrant getting into a stranger's unmarked van.

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Wednesday, Jan 30 2019

@ said:

Sleep is a practice just like anything else. I highly recommend "Sleep Smarter: 21 Essential Strategies to Sleep Your Way to a Better Body, Better Health, and Bigger Success" by Shawn Stevenson. This is available in print and audio form (great for those of us commuting back and forth from school and work) and is only 6.5 hours long in that format. It covers everything from how a lack of sunlight affects our sleep, avoiding screens before bedtime, and has a whole chapter on smart supplementation. What an incredible difference this has made in my life and in giving my body what it needs to heal and learn. Even if you have an off night of sleep on the night before the test, you can have banked enough restorative sleep to not let this wreck your performance. Great news for those of us who tend to obsess the night before!

I totally tend to obsess the night before so this is awesome and I'll look into it. Thanks.

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Jan 29 2019

Dude I have no idea what to do. I was ready to know my score the moment I put my pencil down. I really think this will be the longest three weeks ever.

User Avatar

Tuesday, Jan 29 2019

francesborgmann95631

A Poor Nights Sleep Before Test Day

The night before this Jan 26 LSAT, I got 2.75 hours of sleep.

I tried to close my eyes at 10pm only to fall asleep at 4am. My heart was racing the whole time; it felt like adrenaline was coursing through my veins. The thought that months of prep could be singlehandedly ruined from the effect of one awful sleep made me feel so helpless. It got to the point where I woke my mom up at 3am to ask her what I should do. I fell asleep crying.

But, to my surprise, I woke up at 6:45am feeling ready to fricken rock. Any thought that ventured into the dark territory of "what if your lack of sleep slows down your thought processing?"...I ninja kicked it out of my head. I got to the test centre at 8am (forcing myself to think positive thoughts) and wrote the test feeling as sharp as I would have writing any other PT on a good nights sleep.

If anyone reads this and then come test night experiences this same involuntary alertness, at the very least you can recall my experience to feel a bit more at ease: it is possible to write the LSAT on minimal sleep and still feel confident performance-wise. Be sure to stay positive.

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Sep 18 2018

To add to this ^ I am in the thick of LG right now. Be prepared that it is very different from LR. The beauty of LG is that when you fully understand a game and it's setup, the correct answers will jump out at you with certainty. Sequencing Games you will catch onto and feel confident with. Grouping games comes after and is the more challenging of both game types. But if you mind your timing and keep at it, you will see yourself getting stronger. All it takes is practice and familiarity with the questions.

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Sep 18 2018

After LR, I spent like a day or two summarizing all of it's subheadings/JY's Notes/My notes into a 2-page document. Like JY said - at the end of LR, you should be able to see how all of the different LR question stems grow from the same foundation of reasoning and basically just require you to see the different approaches of analyzing logical relationships. This process of summarizing all of LR helped to see how all of the question stems are different but interrelated. The summary is also a great tool for making quick references, for example, like say in 3 weeks you suddenly feel unclear as to the difference between SA & NA Questions

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Thursday, Aug 16 2018

Thanks guys. @ Negating likelihoods in your herbal medicine example - aside from it being a great mental exercise - helped me to see that the "any chance" was too strong for what was necessary. Thanks

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Jan 15 2019

When I was working full-time, no - I only had enough energy and time to write a full PT after work and then take the next day to BR as much material as I could get through. Recently, however, I quit my job. Given that I have more time, I'm currently writing full PTs and BRing on the same day.

That being said, I have been studying for quite some time now. In my earlier days of studying, PTs drained me. I think I could write maximum 2 PTs per week (BR included). Anything more than that felt "too much". Today, however, PTs don't train my mental faculties as much; the more I learned over the course of 7sage, the more I became acquainted with the questions, the quicker I understood them. In short, I perform less mental gymnastics now per test, so less of my energy is required. This has freed up energy to use for BR. But this has come only with time. Your brain is also a muscle - mental endurance is built over time.

My best advice is stay in tune with your body and energy; you know yourself best. Challenge yourself but be weary of burn out. Mastering the LSAT is a marathon, not a sprint.

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Aug 14 2018

@ what's the tethering assumption?

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, Aug 14 2018

@ Thanks for the reminder that the weakly vs. strongly worded distinction shouldn't bog me down, nor should it be used as my main method of identifying the correct AC. So far I have been negating the answer choices to see which one absolutely wrecks the argument, which has been working. I haven't really used the MBT method of approach so I'll give it a try. Thanks for the response!

In explaining why the AC was correct for a particular Necessary Assumption question, JY said: "This answer choice is great because it states the assumption in a weak way. For Necessary Assumption questions, the LSAT writer's are weary of using language that is too strong... because if they write something that is too strong, it's not necessary."

I can just accept the italicized statement as true and move on but does anyone care to expand on this and explain why it is so?

For reference, the correct answer choice said "can be" (as opposed to, perhaps, "must be").

I understand why conditional language is an indicator of a Sufficient Assumption correct AC (because it bridges premise A to conclusion B ) but I am not fully grasping why, as JY mentioned, we should steer clear from conditional language or language that is "too strong" within Necessary Assumption answer choices.

User Avatar

Thursday, Oct 11 2018

francesborgmann95631

PT36.S1.Q22 - Any writer whose purpose is personal expression

Admin note: Deleted. Please don't post the actual question

Translated:

Poet --> Purpose PE (s) Ambig. Words

Thus.

Poetry Reader --> not the case [enjoyment depends on precise understanding of what poet means]

Correct Answer Choice (C): Admin note: Deleted.

Translated:

If writer that uses words ambiguously --> not the case [have any reader whose enjoyment depends on precise understanding of what the writer means]

My issue is rooted in what appears to be a correct answer choice based on the question's invalid argument form:

A --> B (s) C

A (s) C

In short, in implying that poet's use ambiguous words - is that not an invalid assumption? The purpose of all poets is personal expression & if you are a writer whose purpose is personal expression then you sometimes use words ambiguously. This statement does not necessarily mean that all poets use words ambiguously. It may be the case. It may not be. But I think answer choice C would only make sense if the stimulus was structured like: The purpose of all poets is personal expression & if you are a writer whose purpose is personal expression then you always use words ambiguously.

Does anyone else catch my train of thought?

Admin note: edited title

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-1-question-22/

User Avatar

Thursday, Aug 09 2018

francesborgmann95631

Letting go of what does not serve me on this LSAT journey

I started studying for the LSAT in October 2017. It is currently August 2018. With the passing of ten months, I have realized that my goal of reaching law school is a marathon and not a sprint. Taking 3 weeks or 3 months to study may suit other learners but not me. And that is okay.

Sometimes I wonder if the support that my friends and family initially showed me in October has waned in strength; if the passing of time has caused them to question my abilities. This train of thought, however, does nothing to serve me. I recall that this journey belongs to me. I remind myself that this test requires the steadfast self-belief, patience, and effort that only I can draw from within myself.

Sometimes I get stressed at the thought of "sinking all of my eggs into one basket". That with each passing day, all of my efforts are geared towards something that is perhaps not guaranteed. I suddenly begin to visualize the bitter disappointment of not getting in and feel the ensuing burn of self-doubt. This train of thought, however, does nothing to serve me. I recall that the world owes me nothing. Acceptance into law school will not be served to me on a silver platter. I must be resilient and continue to work hard. There is no other option.

The November 2018 LSAT is 91 days away. I signed up for 7sage in March and have completed 65% of this course. Way back when, I scored a 147 on my first prep test. My current personal best is a159. I have learned an awful lot from 7sage yet there is still much room for growth.

To anyone who has doubts - keep learning and keep looking forward!

User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Wednesday, May 02 2018

Thank you so much everyone! It has officially clicked.

@ The banquet pie example really helped.Thank you!

@ Your explanation of proportional vs. absolute change and the public transportation example totally clarified things! Thanks!

@ I'll be sure to use this question prompt the next time I see a a set of ratios/percentages being compared: "Sure I know the size (%) of the slice, but what is the size of the pie?". Thanks!

@ Thanks for bringing to my attention the tricky meaning of deficit increase. Duly noted.

And, yes, @, it is all about the size of the pie ahaha

User Avatar

Tuesday, May 01 2018

francesborgmann95631

Ratios/Increases/Percentages Confusion

"If we can instill the habits of reading things such as “ratios”, "increase”, and “percentages” and still remember that it doesn’t necessarily mean “more” of something, then we will be less likely tricked on the answer choices." - Someone Else

Someone other than myself wrote this as a comment and I made note of it a while back... I've wrestled with it but can someone please explain this to me like I'm five? /explainlikeimfive

Specifically, how is it possible that an increase in something does not necessarily mean more of that thing?

PrepTests ·
PT109.S4.Q26
User Avatar
francesborgmann95631
Tuesday, May 01 2018

P1. 1st purpose of GSR is to increase STHH.

MP/SC. If a reform makes somebody happy, then that reform is achieving the 1st purpose of GSR

assumption radar: making someone else happy via the proposed reform would in return not make others unhappy

P2. The proposed reform would make constituents happy.

C: Thus, the proposed reform is a GSR.

Confirm action

Are you sure?