5/5 LFG

I chose B on this one because I thought that since it was attacking the premise, then the argument overall would be cooked. However, while it does attack the premise, it does not attack the conclusion. Sure, there might be harm associated with the economic side of it, but that does not say ANYTHING about how it might benefit consumers. Next time it's imperative to distinguish if an answer choice is actually pertinent to the question or if it is just a red herring.