Subscription pricing
Would anyone be willing to trade 'Why X' essays or simply give mine read over?
PT Questions
gerstle1912
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
gerstle1912
Thursday, Apr 23 2020
gerstle1912
Friday, Aug 20 2021
The conclusion of the argument is "The best way to increase the blood supply in the city of Pulaski is to encourage more donations by people who are regular blood donors."
So why is E correct, then, when it states 'almost all blood donors are already giving blood?' Doesn't this AC leave open the possibility of the small proportion of regular blood donors not already maxed out being able to donate blood, thereby increasing the blood supply (even if it's by a tiny bit)? #help
Hey y'all, I need some PS guidance. How important is it for me to talk about why I want to go to law school when I don't have any legal experience on my resume? I wasn't intending to center my PS around this topic, but I recently heard it's recommended for those that don't have such experience.
For context, I was instead intending to talk about learning something new/how this would be transferable to law school.
gerstle1912
Friday, Feb 12 2021
I've completed/foolproofed about 15 LG sections. I'm aiming to drill the entire 'bundle' (LG PT 1-35) along with LG's from the PT's I take. Although I've seen gradual improvements from my review, I don't believe 15 is enough.
From what I've heard, the more logic games you can be exposed to, the better. Like any part of the LSAT, the games, and the rules within them, are repetitive; the more games you see, the more you'll be able to anticipate various assumptions being made--even on more difficult ones.
I think it's additionally important to avoid rushing through foolproofing. As has been reiterated again and again, review is the most fundamental part of improvement, especially if you're trying to go -0. Try to consider why it is that you dislike foolproofing; if it seems mundane, come up with a solution to combat that. Maybe try to complete the individual game under target time, or create sets of all the games that are the hardest (4/5 stars) or that you have the most trouble with.
gerstle1912
Friday, Feb 12 2021
@ @ @ @ @ Thanks all! Definitely feel more so inspired and relieved that many of us are in the same boat.
I work 40 hrs/week in the service industry so it can be difficult to stay on top of studying, but I plan on prolonging my study schedule until mid-summer (already been on and off for about a year).
Contemplating taking on studying as a full time gig, or at minimum reducing my hours at work, but I want to see how many users out there feel they are able to fulfill study goals while working FT!
LSAT
·
PT 7.4.11 Scientific research at a certain university was supported in part by an annual grant..
gerstle1912
Monday, May 11 2020
@ Thanks so much for the thorough response, it's a tremendous help!
gerstle1912
PT 7.4.11 Scientific research at a certain university was supported in part by an annual grant..
Can anyone explain why C would be incorrect, and why A would instead be the correct AC?
I recognize that stats are the most important consideration for any law school, but do you feel it's important to have 'professional' job experience?
Context: I've been working in outdoor retail for 2+ years now, and I'm wondering if I should pick up some sort of extracurricular to strengthen my application, or simply find a new job. I don't think it'll necessarily harm my chances, but will admissions officers likely be unimpressed with my current work?
gerstle1912
Tuesday, Oct 05 2021
I ultimately eliminated C because it used the word 'many', which could be interpreted as either a lot of predators or just a few. I chose to interpret it as the latter, and consequently I felt like it was too much of jump to assume that the few predators that perceive color/pattern differently are the same ones that prey upon the species with b&w coloration.
Does anyone have any insight into why this reasoning would be wrong in this circumstance?
#help
I’m interested!