Why is making up the premise for the second example a problem? The “only” tells us that “Jedi” is the necessary condition and then “Force” in the sufficient. Where is the problem in creating this premise?

#feedback

Why use A and B when making these examples? Especially when reordering. It would be much more helpful to actually type it out.

In the second example, it mentions the premise is made up, but fails to explain those details.

Looking for help with #2. I understand how to get the 4 relationships, but I come up with 5 inferences by the end. Where did I go wrong in thinking that there were more than the 2 inferences the explanation gave?

Rltnshp. (Contra.)

/B -> R (/R -> B)

/A -> /R (R -> A)

S -> /A (A -> /S)

/R -> J (/J -> R)

#1) /B -> R -> A -> /S

#2) /J -> R -> A -> /S

#3) /A -> /R -> B

#4) /A-> /R -> J

#5) /A -> /R -> A -> /S