Anyone have an idea why LSAC makes us wait nearly 3 weeks for the results of an online exam? lol
I mean, surely 7 to 10 days should be enough to certify the results of the Flex?
-Impatient in NYC
Interested!
Interested!
Anyone have an idea why LSAC makes us wait nearly 3 weeks for the results of an online exam? lol
I mean, surely 7 to 10 days should be enough to certify the results of the Flex?
-Impatient in NYC
Just finished my Flex! I got LR - LG - RC. Overall, it felt like a slightly above average difficulty exam from the upper 80's. I found LR to be a little easier than average, but I had to guess on 2 questions at the end. LG's 1-3 were very easy but my nerves got the best of me in game 3, wasted time and I ended up having to guess on most of game 4. Reading comp... ouch. I did the passages out of order, 3,4,1,2 after noticing how unequal the distribution of number of questions to passages were and I'm so glad I did because I would have wasted way too much time trying to answer the questions in passage 1; some incredibly hard questions. Expecting 158/9 praying for a 160-163. Good luck everyone and lets hope we get a generous curve!!
LR - RC - LR - LG. Was I the only one who had this order? First LR had to be experimental; was 5x harder than the second LR, which was a piece of cake. The RC I had was about Paternalism, Mali, Short Stories, and Human Evolution. Tbh, this RC killed me. The passages were horribly written, dense, and the questions and ACs felt harder to grasp. I just didn't feel prepared for the rigor based on the 70s and 80s PTs, all of which I have done. LG was a piece of cake. Honestly just praying for a 160.
Just finished! Had RC - LR - LG. On the whole, a VERY reasonable test. Didn’t have the Econ preq/museum burglars games. Hoping I did as well as I think I did!
Hi everyone, I'm a bit confused as to why for PT May 2020, 7sage does not list the level of difficulty for each of the questions. Yet, JY has posted explanations for every question for the test. Anyone have an idea why the difficulty levels are missing?
Just finished! My LSAT-Flex was LR - RC - LG. On the whole, it felt slightly above average in terms of difficulty. The LR was tricky. The stimuli were consistently confusingly worded from beginning to end of the section. RC was pretty normal except the comparative passage which was near impossible to decipher. LG was a piece of cake.
I can only speak from my personal experience, but I would unequivocally recommend doing your full length practice exams ONLY on Lawhub. If you are expecting the interface and visual experience of the actual LSAT to be very close to 7sage on test day, you're in for a big surprise. It's a lot harder to look at than 7sage's and resembles something from a Windows computer from 20 years ago.
Feeling immense disappointment, like so many Jan Test 7sagers today. My PT avg.was a solid 163 leading into the test and I fought insanely hard to get there. Actual January test score ended up being 156. It hurts.
One whole year of studying and 3 official LSAT takes later, managed to score a 166 on the June exam! I am highly considering a 4th retake to try and break 170, as I am shooting for a T14 school, but I am afraid of jinxing it and ending up with a lower 4th score that may weaken my overall application. At any rate, so relieved to have made it to 166 from a 144 diagnostic score. Heartfelt thanks to JY and the whole team at 7sage!