- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@kalewongelaw470 okay that confused me too, but what you want to do is just right click on your image directly and copy image address instead of posting the link you got from imgur. put THAT link in the space provided within this handy dandy sentence and it should work:
< img src="your image link.png" width="600" >
@lsoglesbee623 Hey! Sorry for the late response. I've been on jvscholz's discord server. There are lots of people on there just studying and often people have their cameras on. You can look him up or use this invite link: https://discord.gg/jvscholz
See you there!
Hi! I don't remember 100% but I think the first thing you do is pay for the test on the LSAC and tell them your testing preferences (in person, remote, etc). Then LSAC will email you in the weeks leading up to the registration deadline with more information. Whenever they email saying that testing registration with the proctor is available you register for the exam and pick your testing location then. I've never heard of someone not being able to test because of overbooking. But play it safe and make sure that you're logging on to register for the test with the proctor the moment the LSAC says you can.
what hope do you run of the mill cardiologists have! if our champion hero cannot defeat the great the robot!
Hi Avatario, I feel you. I was scoring in the 170s in my PTs before I took the August LSAT, and on the official I got a 164 which I didn't feel accurately represented my skills, just my fear on test day. I'm studying to retake now, and some of the things I'm doing to mimic test day are to give myself less time per section when I take the PTs and to join a discord livestream with my camera on to mimic being proctored. Plus, I'd recommend pursuing an accommodation if you have testing anxiety, ADHD, or some other disability that a doctor can diagnose. I hope that helps, I'm with you!

So, the speaker in the argument isn't "insulting" the opponent, he's refuting their argument that "all hikers will litter." That's a valid way to refute the opponents' argument, like you said, but it's NOT enough to construct a NEW argument in favor of developing the hiking trail. It's just like what JY said about McDonalds. You can refute a dumb argument for not going to McDonalds (e.g. the yellow M is too bright), but that's not enough on its own to prove that we then SHOULD go to McDonalds. There could be other reasons why we should not go to McDonalds, even if that one reason for not going is weak.