- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Respectfully, the LSAT will not care about an opinion or not. We have to throw out that, and focus on the arguments validity. It is VALID that if you open a restaurant, it is sufficient in improving the living standards.
The way i remember it, B is SUPER(set) Necessary to A , and then the subset and suffienct falls in place
Sorry I know this is not answering your question but can I ask how are you using Drills in connection to your Syllabus learning? Do you do one every lesson, every week. I am new and want to know how to utilize them to the best effectiveness
EX. My house (sufficiency) is in Canada (necessity)
It is NECESSARY for me to be in Canada if I am in my house
It is SUFFICIENT for me to be in my house to be in Canada
It is impossible to be in my house without being in Canada
It is possible I am in Canada without being in my house
Do I have it right?
So I am taking the LSAT in September with the new revised model, so I am skipping the LG sections and focusing hard on LR and RC. I wanted to ask what is the best routine to integrate drills into the study session.
I hear a lot of the drills come from PT, and burning though Drills means come PT time, you have essentially already seen some of the questions prior (do I have this right?).
So I wanted to ask if this is the same for post August PTs aswell, and for those taking it without LR, how are you using your PTs and Drills
Any help is valued. Thanks!
Is it just me or is #18 such a stretch? I personally find it easier to read it all, find the necessary and then identify all sufficient claims that go with the necessary. This kicking up think can help on some lengthy LR questions but some seem to be a waste of time if you already have a decent understanding of lawgic