Im currently having issues pertaining to Logic Games. I'm having issues in terms of which game board type I would apply depending on the stimulus. I'm not sure if I should do In/Out or Grouping or a mix of two depending on the situation is what I'm having issues with immensely. I haven't practiced the logic games section that much though in terms of the explanation videos JY provides. Do you think if I print the Logic Game questions out that are provided in the curriculum and doing them over and over again will help me identify which game board I use in the future on other questions? I would appreciate any guidance!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I spent hours trying to figure what's wrong but to make it EASIER FOR YOUR GUYS, THINK ABOUT THE CONCLUSION AND ITS CONNECTIONS TO THE BOTH THE PREMISES!! THE PERSUING EXCELLENCE AND THE UNWILLING TO UNDERGO PERSONAL CHANGE!!! NOW THE CONCLUSION IS THAT ITS A BAD PRINCIPLE! NOW, HOW DO WE NECESSITATE THAT ITS BAD? BY REMOVING ONE OF THE PREMISES AND BY DOING THAT, IT DOESNT FOLLOW THAT THEY'RE GENUINELY HAPPY IF THEY DONT FOLLOW BOTH! NOW ANSWER CHOICE B REMOVES ONE THE PREMISES!!!! BY DOING THIS, IT MAKES IT A BAD PRINCIPLE AND THEREFORE, YOU'RE UNHAPPY!! THANK ME LATER
To provide a simplistic explanation if you chose E over A, you didn't focus on the POWERFUL TEMPTATION part stated in the first part. While in the second part it doesn't talk about overcoming any POWERFUL TEMPTATION. A solves it
For C, the reason why that's wrong is because we have no specification regarding the number of years like 150 years? The answer choice states, ALMOST ALL OF THE BOOKS THAT GRADUALLY DETERIORATE ARE MADE OF ACIDIC PAPER. The stimulus states that for the past 150 years, paper was acidic, but this answer choice doesn't specify the number of years? Also, it leads to an error because it makes us assume that ALL BOOKS IN OUR ENTIRE HISTORY EVEN BEFORE THE PAST 150 YEARS ARE MADE OF ACIDIC PAPER. THATS A HUGE ASSUMPTION TO MAKE! LASTLY, we can't assume that all books that deteriorate are inherently acidic when it doesn't EXPLICITLY state that!! Because books can also deteriorate for other reasons?
To provide another explanation for B, the reason why is because there is an assumption that ALMOST ALL PUBLISHED BOOKS WILL GRADUALLY DESTROY THEMSELVES. We could have a case where over half of the amount of them are deemed significant, lets say 60% vs 40% insignificant, can we still say that ALMOST ALL PUBLISHED BOOKS WILL GRADUALLY DESTROY THEMSELVES when they are de-acidified in the process? But you see, they didn't specify it being acidified or de-acidified in this answer choice as well?
#help (Added by Admin)
Democracy in America by the French philosopher Alexis Tocqueville! It uses a high level of political vocabulary, I'm close to finishing it at 707 pages. Get the one produced by PENGUIN CLASSICS.
Hi, I would profoundly appreciate it if I can possibly obtain the quizlet link! Thanks!
AYOO