hannahkay0214234
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
Does anyone know of any resources that resemble the skill builders from the core curriculum, but mix them all up together? Since the skill builders lump all the similar ones in order, I can feel my brain zoning out and not actually learning the drill but instead just copying and pasting the format of the answer.
I am going to make a quizlet that basically mixes all the skill builders from the foundations unit, but figured I'd see if it already exists before I do!
How would you translate a sentence into lawgic that has both negate sufficient & negate necessary indicators in it?
Ex: "No entry after 9 pm without a valid ID." or "One cannot bake a cake without flour."
Am I getting tripped up on this sentence?
"Given that the previous argument is invalid and we can transform this argument into the previous one, then this one must be invalid as well."
I thought inferring only went one way - all down to most down to some. Wouldn't we transform the previous argument into this one (A —m→ B implies A ←s→ B) and not the other way around? #feedback