User Avatar
havenrocha601
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT147.S2.P3.Q21
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Monday, May 29 2023

21 may take the cake as the most tedious, hair splitting question I've seen on these tests to date. I think I need a drink.

PrepTests ·
PT137.S1.P1.Q7
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Saturday, May 27 2023

Question 7 is totally unreasonable, and that's saying something for the LSAT.

User Avatar
havenrocha601
Saturday, May 06 2023

This is Prep Test B, Feb 1999, Game 2.

It's not about a specific question, rather, how the contrapositive is reached from the following: /Y → (L↔/O)

PrepTests ·
PT146.S2.Q7
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Thursday, Jan 04 2024

Once in a while a question comes along that's a complete crock of shit, and this is one of those instances.........

Hello all. This is from the trees game in prep test B. When applying the rules for embedded conditionals from the core curriculum, I come up with the following:

/Y → (L↔/O) = /Y and L ↔/O This could also be read as: /Y and O ↔/L

Contrapositive: O↔/L or Y Is this correct? It doesn't seem to make sense in the context of the game.

However, in the explanation of the game, the contrapositive is treated as a forever together biconditional

(L ↔ O) → Y or (/L↔/O) → Y

What am I missing here?

Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-b-section-2-game-2/

Confirm action

Are you sure?