User Avatar
havenrocha601
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT146.S2.Q7
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Thursday, Jan 04 2024

Once in a while a question comes along that's a complete crock of shit, and this is one of those instances.........

19
PrepTests ·
PT147.S2.P3.Q21
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Monday, May 29 2023

21 may take the cake as the most tedious, hair splitting question I've seen on these tests to date. I think I need a drink.

29
PrepTests ·
PT137.S1.P1.Q7
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Saturday, May 27 2023

Question 7 is totally unreasonable, and that's saying something for the LSAT.

9
User Avatar
havenrocha601
Saturday, May 06 2023

This is Prep Test B, Feb 1999, Game 2.

It's not about a specific question, rather, how the contrapositive is reached from the following: /Y → (L↔/O)

0

Hello all. This is from the trees game in prep test B. When applying the rules for embedded conditionals from the core curriculum, I come up with the following:

/Y → (L↔/O) = /Y and L ↔/O This could also be read as: /Y and O ↔/L

Contrapositive: O↔/L or Y Is this correct? It doesn't seem to make sense in the context of the game.

However, in the explanation of the game, the contrapositive is treated as a forever together biconditional

(L ↔ O) → Y or (/L↔/O) → Y

What am I missing here?

Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-b-section-2-game-2/

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?