The stimulus states that "fewer of these books are being published". If answer B is true that the quality of books has gone down, would that not cause all categories of books to be published less as well? It appears the answer does not give a reason for the specific category of books with intrinsic value. #help

I got the correct answer to this question. However, there appears to be an incorrect assumption in the answer. The fact that there was a decline in income does not directly connect to the drop in meal sales. Is this not a typical assumption the LSAT tricks us into making?#help

I would say that the administrator reapplied the phrase. The translation remained the same it was just used to include funding for the new technologies. #help

It could be I'm being too much of a perfectionist. I should try to document what my struggles are...and have a beer.

Why are we assuming the damaged mail makes up such a small minority? Maybe all mail that arrived three or more days later was damaged?

#help (Added by Admin)

#help For all we know, in 1991 they could have mined 50 and consumed 10 leaving over 40. In 1990 they could have mined 60 and consumed 10 leaving over 50. In this scenario, there is less in the year 1991 but they still mined more than what they consumed. I don't get this one.

I understand that Weakening Arguments require one to attack the supports, but why is attacking the premise not weakening the argument as well?

#help (Added by Admin)

This was just another case of me getting tripped up by a conclusion indicator - "conclude". JD explained in the last quiz that since the stimulus used the word "therefore" we can assume that the conclusion is what follows. But in this stimulus it literally uses the word "conclude". So my conclusion (pun intended) is that conclusion indicators are never a guarantee to indicate the main conclusion. Someone tell me if I am wrong.

Thank you so much. This is my only source of studying so I'll be taking this pretty seriously. If you think I can get through it than I think that should work for me.

But is this timeframe for completing the course including Practice tests?

There is an assumption made in answer B - "cause accidents" needs to be understood as causing others to be involved in accidents. Causing an accident does not intrinsically mean causing damage to others, it could simply refer to the sports car driver themself.

@, I’ve only joined recently and to be honest it’s been pretty quiet. From what I’ve seen so far it’s more people asking general questions, but I do believe some people may have arranged private study sessions with other members of the group so that might be an option for you.

I did not select answer C because it does not mention the factor of one item being more available than the other. Why is this not an issue?#help

There’s a study group for the Jan LSAT on GroupMe that I’m part of. Lmk if you’re interested