#feedback I feel that the explanation given in the review perfectly encapsulates why this answer is incorrect, IF you are able to readily recall information from previous lessons. Way back in the beginning, somewhere in Foundations, we were taught to put effort into not using information we learned outside of what is given in the test to answer questions. It's evident that materials used in an archeological site will reveal information about the site and artifact itself, but how did you come to this conclusion? I deduce you came to conflate this idea of materials with missing information that future archeologists may seek because of prior knowledge you have gained in life. We are made to believe that we know all the information about these archeological findings that we must now from the stim and stimulus.

I have learned that within the bounds of the LSAT, act like you are a kindergartener. Use ONLY information given in the stimulus and stim to come to your answer, shirk prior knowledge about topics ranging from archeological finds to Garfield. If the LSAT writers say that the sky is purple, the sky is purple. If there is any reason to explain why the sky is purple in the answer choices, pick that one.

First time I took this, I got 3/5 on medium difficulty but got them right on the Blind Review. I reviewed the answers, focusing on what I had done differently with the Blind Review. I immediately took another med. difficulty and got 5/5!