I am in the same position. I totally think you are doing the right thing by trying to get some time in in the mornings! I don't know about you, but I have a really hard time studying after work as I am usually really exhausted. Especially if your job is stressful, try to make your study mornings as relaxing as possible. Make your favorite coffee/tea, light a candle, do whatever will help you set a good start to your day.

More generally, know that you are enough! When I was in school, I remember having friends that were able to study 5-8 hours a day and take the test with only 3-4 months of studying. For a long time I was comparing myself to them (even with a full time job) and it made me feel really discouraged and like I wasn't doing enough/never going to reach my goals. Focus on quality over quantity. If you can only put 30 min aside, just make it the most productive/focused 30 minutes possible! You can also break your studying up into really small pieces throughout the day. I love having the 7sage app on my phone so I can do a couple of LR questions during a 10 minute break or during your commute. Every little thing counts!

Also, it's ok to take days/time off from studying. Actually, it is critical. If you are really burnt out from work your studying isn't going to be very productive. It is a long journey, so take care of yourself and you will be happier :)

You got this!

So we know that the answer to this type of question is basically a conclusion to the stimulus... Does that mean that the correct answer must address all components of the stimulus? I’m just trying to think of some other ways to eliminate answer choices, but it might be irrelevant. #help

Interested!

This is inspiring! I just started my LG journey and although I usually use a pen, I'm going to use pencils like this! It seems like a fun way to visualize all of the time and effort you've put into studying :) thanks for the idea!

#help Would C be a sufficient assumption?

I would love to join!

I still don't understand why "engaging in diplomatic discussions" in answer A would not be an act to benefit the country. #help

I got this right on the timed section but then ended up selecting ac C on blind review. I think I took "dramatically increased the level of detail" may include ink color as well, and that since B mentioned "sophisticated counterfeiters" (and not ones without printing experience, as mentioned in the stimulus" that it did not directly weaken the argument. Does anyone have any advice on how to not make similar mistakes like this in the future?

#help (Added by Admin)

interested :)

interested if you're still getting people together. it would be wonderful to be part of this group!