does "likely" translates to Most?

The way I was able to eliminate A was focusing on the word "habitat." Just because you are able to preserve the habitat doesn't mean that you are saving the species. So it really doesn't do anything for the argument. It might actually strengthen the argument, because despite being able to better preserve the habitat, the rate of extinction is going up.

can answer choice B a sufficient assumption answer?

I narrowed down to A and D but chose D because I conflated the idea of often with most. (often is closer to being some than most apparently). After thinking about the statement, "wealth is often harmful to people," I came up with this explanation to understand it. Let me know if there's any flaws in my reasoning.

it obviously doesn't make sense to say that some wealth are harmful to people in the context of the stimulus. It doesn't make sense because that requires identifying what kinds of wealth we are talking about and that is not stated in the stimulus.

but, it makes sense to say sometimes, wealth is harmful to people.

so ( W --> H), and this conditional statement is true sometimes.

To say that wealth is often (sometimes) harmful to people is like saying, sometimes, W --> H.

and the other premise states that good things cause no harm at all, or if good thing then no harm.

since the statement G --> /H is true every time, we can then say that Wealth is not a good thing to draw a valid conclusion.

Whenever I feel defeated, I tell myself there is always something good coming from this seemingly bad defeat.

Only fight that matters is on the test day and the thousand defeats along the way are only going to make you stronger and smarter.

Dont focus on the results right now, focus on the process and cherish the grind.

Take a knee and reset your mind. Go out on the attack.

Thanks guys!

@rileymajeunefagan676 thank you for your response!

i edited my post! it's Q15, not 13.

thank you for this clarification!