So to clarify, in SA questions, are there two types of arguments we might encounter? The first type is where a new word or concept appears in the conclusion that wasn't in the premises, and we need to find an answer that bridges the premises to that new conclusion term. The second type is where the premise and conclusion already share repeated words or concepts, but there are two premises that don't connect to each other, and we need to find an answer that links those two disconnected premises together. In both cases we're bridging a gap — the difference is just in where that gap is located: either between the premises and the conclusion, or between the two premises themselves. Is that the correct way to think about it?