User Avatar
isabellacastro57082
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

Lessons · You Try - Government Censoring Opinion (PSAr)
User Avatar
isabellacastro57082
Tuesday, Apr 08 2025

Practice makes perfect! You got this!

6
Study Groups · Boston area study group?
User Avatar
isabellacastro57082
Thursday, Apr 03 2025

Intersted!

0
Lessons · Group 2 - Necessary Condition Indicators
User Avatar
isabellacastro57082
Saturday, Dec 14 2024

so would it need to say 5+ for it to work? what if it said 6 minutes?

0
Lessons · Example Argument - Tigers
User Avatar
isabellacastro57082
Thursday, Dec 12 2024

When I read the example the first time it was easy for me to define which one was the premise and which one was the conclusion.

When he flipped it, I am having a really hard time understanding why

"Not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet."

doesn't support

" Tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people."

If anyone could give me clarity, I would really appreciate it.

My assumption would be because the first statement is too much of a general rule and saying tigers would be too specific when it should be about just mammals generally.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?