Subscription pricing
PT Questions
isaiahcv123597
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
isaiahcv123597
Friday, Jul 24 2015
@ No I have not taken a diagnostic. I was planning on going through Trainer first, then purchasing 7Sage. What approach should I take on both? I have 20 hours per week for the next three weeks; then after that it opens up to 30 hours a week. These are the only resources I'm using thus far.
@ thanks for the encouragement!
I would like to take the December LSAT, but am not sure if I can perform as well as I would like. My goal is 160+ range. I do have time on my hands. I am willing to work my butt off If it can be done. If so, what resources and study plan should I follow. (Just purchased the trainer) Thank you :)
isaiahcv123597
Monday, Aug 10 2015
@.hopkins Nice, so you really did take your time to nail it down. That's exactly how I want to feel and score at. How many hours a week did you realistically put in? I want to cover a good amount similar to your experience.
After studying The Trainer, as well as here at 7Sage. I realized that there really is much to grasp than what appears on the surface. Learning the fundamentals and building one's skills is vital to success. My original goal was to take the December LSAT, although I had from the start a four month prep period, I don't feel I can master these skills yet. (I need a 165+) In addition, I want to participate in an internship to add to my law school application.
My Question IS: How should I prepare to take the LSAT a year from now? I don't want to burn myself out, but at the same time not take things too slowly. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Also any tips to improve my resume/law school application would be great!
isaiahcv123597
Friday, Nov 06 2015
There is absolutely only one right answer and four wrong choices every single time. If your worried about confusing flaw issues focus on eliminating choices that don't properly answer the question stem. That's what I do, hope this helps!
isaiahcv123597
Thursday, Nov 05 2015
In order to shatter past reasoning I'd like to share and explain my thought process:
- I also got tricked by A, because I didn't read the choice thoroughly and assumed it was wrong.
- B & C were quickly eliminated. (They were completely irrelevant to the premise)
- E seemed correct, but after thinking about it, by choosing this answer we would have to argue that absolutely no reduction of environmental degradation occurred. Meaning that the environment wasn't harmed worse or recovered but kept the same. (This doesn't sound right or align with the premise)
- Then while looking at choice D, is just doesn't make sense for more emissions to result from "emission- free" cars.
- Lastly, I realized that in the question stem we must choose what logically completes the argument. Who's argument? The author, who is challenging these "proponents". Meaning that if an answer choice contains the rival opponent's argument "proponents may believe" it's smart to fully understand what it's saying.
- In sum, the conclusion must state the main point (which is supported by the premise) against the opponent's argument.
isaiahcv123597
Monday, Nov 02 2015
This makes me feel happy in a way knowing that there is no "choose the best answer" but rather only one correct answer!
@ Thank you, I will take this tomorrow and let you know how it goes!