User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Friday, Oct 25 2019

Never mind I just figured out how to create your own problem set :)

For example I would like to do just the LG sections for a few earlier PTs, but I can't seem to access individual sections on the digital tool without taking the entire test. Nor can I blind review and check the answers just for one section. If this isn't an option now, I would highly recommend you guys make this a feature for future 7Sagers!

PrepTests ·
PT138.S1.P3.Q16
User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Monday, Apr 22 2019

Hmm I am not seeing how the answer for 16 is E - receptive- I chose D - indifference because I felt that the author really did not make their opinion known one way or the other, and seemed to mostly just be descriptive. JY uses the last sentence as evidence but again, it seems to me the author is just describing how the theory was eventually accepted by mainstream economists.

#help

PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q21
User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Tuesday, Apr 16 2019

I initially picked C but changed to E on blind review, but for a different reason than the one JY gives for eliminating C. I think the argument DOES give an example, but C is wrong because the argument is giving an example of what social scientists need to assess in order to determine if there is causation (which is what AC E says), NOT an example of a causal relationship.

User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Tuesday, Oct 15 2019

@ said:

@

Barring anything unusual, we usually get the PT on the day that LSAC releases the score to students. We start selling it as an add-on within 1 week, and all video explanations are done within 30-60 days from then.

Thank you so much Elaine! So since the scores for September were released yesterday, I should be able to take it as a PT by next week, although the video explanations will not be up for a while?

PrepTests ·
PT132.S4.Q26
User Avatar
jacideitch8361
Wednesday, Apr 10 2019

I'm really struggling with understanding how A helps explain the findings. The findings show that more people over the age of 65 were diagnosed as malnourished than fell below FPL, and that more people under 65 fell below FPL than were malnourished. So if doctors are less likely to diagnose malnutrition in people over 65 than in people younger than 65, as AC A says, wouldn't that mean there is even a bigger discrepancy between percentage of malnourished/impoverished between the two groups? That the actual percentage of malnourished 65+ year olds is say, 40%, with 12% still impoverished? #help

Confirm action

Are you sure?