User Avatar
jamalmtshali192
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
jamalmtshali192
Friday, Apr 26 2019

Thanks for the reply, your suggestion is sound. The 157 was an unpleasant surprise, but is a score nonetheless. I have been doing 2 to 3 tests a week. I have been told that if nothing else I need to be doing PT's to get accustomed to the rigors of a full-length administration. I do realize taking PT's to improve your score is a lot like checking your blood pressure to treat hypertension, but having come to the point where I feel the returns from the guides have already diminished substantially I am unsure of what else to do (that and drilling individual sections, of course). The tutor has helped with some unique LG strategies and we will be going over RC and LR soon, but regardless I am vigilantly seeking well-informed suggestions wherever I can. Also, I have not done the CC.

I signed up for June partly because I wanted the last paper administration but also because I've been putting off the LSAT for awhile and finally decided to buckle down and do it. That it's the last paper administration is almost an arbitrary mechanism.

User Avatar

Friday, Apr 26 2019

jamalmtshali192

June Taker, Score Plateau

Hi, all. Longtime lurker, first-time poster.

I’m sitting for the June test and aiming to score over 170. I have been prepping since the end of January and began doing PT’s just over 3 weeks ago, starting out with 162 and 165 on my first two tests (June 2017 and Dec 2015 respectively). Since then I have jumped all over the place (as low as 157 on Sep 2009 two weeks ago and as high as 166 on June 2012 just two days ago) but am shaking out a 162 average.

The trajectory doesn’t look as I had hoped (especially after pulling a 165 on just my second PT), although I have read progress is often not linear. I have a little tutoring assistance that’s so far focused on shoring up LG (I am missing 9 on average, although the initial average was much higher—I am going through foolproofing now). I am missing 8.5 LR on average and 5 RC on average.

With just over 5 weeks to go, I am becoming a bit worried. I am unsure how much my performance is a matter of focus and recognition being below where I need it or how much is comprehension/ability (not that these are necessarily mutually exclusive). At this stage I think I have probably gotten most of the meat out of the major guides and would potentially be wasting valuable time poring through them for info that may not add anything.

Does anyone have any specific recommendations or suggestions on “quick” strategies for shoring things up? For LR, I keep reading about pre-phrasing but have not tried it intently. With RC (legendary for being almost impossible to improve) I have gotten the basic advice to read paragraphs twice, remember that most answers are not really inferences but are actually in the text, etc. but I think this alone is too basic.

Any suggestions anyone might have would be greatly appreciated!

User Avatar
jamalmtshali192
Friday, Apr 24 2020

@ said:

I would not encourage you to copy and paste recycled language from an earlier more extensive LOCI in your follow up email. If you have something substantive to add to your original application submission, like a new test score, or an updated resume reflecting new activities since the time of original submission, you can send that along. It will help the adcom make a fully informed decision. If you just want to let them know that you are still interested in the school and available to attend right now, then your email should convey this in a brief and concise manner. The adcom doesn't want to read any more than they need to. Good luck!

Very helpful, thanks!

User Avatar

Friday, Apr 24 2020

jamalmtshali192

LOCIs

Referencing the post on "What To Do After You Get Waitlisted," there is a section addressing students who have not heard back yet. While it says it is okay for a student with no decision to send a LOCI so long as one's application was submitted at least 2 or 3 months prior, I was wondering what the nature of follow-up LOCIs should be? On timing, the post's suggestion was to send follow-up LOCIs to schools on a monthly basis after the initial (and especially before the seat deposit deadline). I sent LOCIs to a number of schools I'd not yet heard back from at the very beginning of this month, writing the LOCI in a format similar to a personal statement, submitting a "Why X" essay in cases where I'd not already submitted one, and also writing a shorter LOCI in the body of the email.

That having been my initial LOCI blast, should my follow-up basically just be a cut-and-paste of my email statement? I don't want to make things unnecessarily strenuous by drafting a new statement with "new" interests, but not sure if a copy-and-paste of an email I already sent is that helpful. Any suggestions on how to approach this?

Confirm action

Are you sure?