I think this is the first question I've come across that I truly don't understand. I don't think I'm getting what the "obvious alternative" is. Not sending police officers? Dying here, plz help.
Admin note: edited title
I think this is the first question I've come across that I truly don't understand. I don't think I'm getting what the "obvious alternative" is. Not sending police officers? Dying here, plz help.
Admin note: edited title
I think what your law buddies should have said to you was "ultimately, the law school I attended didn't make a difference in my law career," not, "it doesn't matter what law school you attend." Someone who has found success out of a less than prestigious school will tell you it doesn't matter where you go, because for him it didn't matter. It's genuine advice, but take it with a gain of salt.
My goal is to be taking 5-section tests from now until the June LSAT, but I want to make it feel as real as possible. Does anyone have a good method of disguising the extra section within their test? I found a RC section from another test that matched my RC section # and blacked out any identifying information. I shuffled up the 5 sections and made sure I had no idea which was coming next. It was kind of a hassle and I ended up knowing which was which anyway (I inadvertently took a glance at the first passage when blacking out), but I'm interested to hear how other people organize their 5-sections. Any tips would be helpful.
I recently started taking old PTs and I think it's an underrated component of studying. Aside from some 5-star questions I've specifically reviewed for their Q-type, I can't remember stems or answers to most any of the questions, let alone so well that I don't have to go through the mental processes required to answer them. The value of taking these re-tests is in identifying the questions that for whatever reason haven't sunk in after all those months. That two-star question you got wrong and wrote off as a misread? Well, you got it wrong again, maybe take closer look this time. It helps to identify things that maybe aren't noticeable in normal, progressive studying. Also, if you're like me, you learn to approach these re-tests with an incredulous eye, specifically for the reason stated above. It's just another training tool, and I think they're great for timed sections as well.
EDIT: Just FYI, all the old tests I've taken thus far have 6+ months distance on them
Thanks guys, makes sense. Total mental block last night I appreciate the help.