like for these questions should we map it out? or should we still be able to do it in our mind??

#help (Added by Admin)

I think this question is a strengthen or NA

This question is rough and I see your point completely (I spent like 8min on this question in BR), however, I would argue that traces by definition(very small quantity, especially one too small to be accurately measured; and in terms of science most likely negligible or statistically insignificant amount) will not induce a spike of any sort especially if the spike has any time value attached to it ("short term"). It is more than reasonable to assume a volcano-induced SO2 spike on earth and or venous would last more than a second or two; hence, to be coined "short term spike" the presence of traces of sulfur dioxide is irrelevant so to speak.

Further, I think the usage of the word "earth" rather than venus is a much larger issue considering the scientist is attempting to argue against the volcano analogy; who's to say the analogy was not flawed, to begin with. In other words, Earth and venus have a completely different atmosphere and perhaps on venus SeO2 is produced via volcano instead of the SO2 (that rotten egg smell btw) on earth. The world in which this scientist exists could've easily had the earth and venus to be nothing alike and vice versa.

^ to simplify even further, you are weakening a question via a potential flawed method of reasoning (the question doesn't explicitly say earth and venus are alike) hence no weakening can be accomplished.

you got this don't be so hard on yourself

Speaking for myself I overthought this question had D circles but couldn't eliminate C so ended on wasting time on this question and to have it wrong. Circle and move on during the test,,go with thy feel folks!!

this for real? I feel like this is a inside joke can someone from stuff confirm this #help

following

Didn't get this question wrong because I noted that for most NA questions if the answer seems too perfect(SUFFICIENT kinda good) then is probably not correct (especially if is choice E)

tough one read the question right but still chose the wrong answer

Is a pretty steep assumption regardless (answer E is the better answer no question), Nevertheless, you have to correlate # of ER goes up with the decline of fatalities which is a pretty big leap. A, B, C directly affect the driving conditions (seatbelt, road, time spent driving) which is a much smaller and more understandable leap. I think this question can be better worded maybe is an old LSAT

Interested!!

I find that whenever a LSAT answer has multiple synonyms for the same word consequence/occurrence/outcome... they are trying to trip you up so I tend to skip those answers and coming back to it.

The wording for question 2 really had me going for a solid 2 min ...

same

same

I'd like to join as well!!