For those who once were scoring well below the 169+ mark, what were some of the larger breakthroughs in your prep that allowed you to finally start scoring in the 169+ range?
How was your approach to questions different for when you were scoring
well below 169+ to then scoring above 169+?
Thanks in advance for those that share their thoughts.
I'll get straight into it. I have no problem getting the correct level 1, 2, 3 star questions (as labelled by 7sage), but i tend to get level 4 and 5 questions wrong more times than not.
This applies to both logical reasoning and reading comprehensions
For logical reasoning i would get questions ranging from 16-25 wrong and for reading comprehension, just when i think i am going to get all the correct answers for a particular passage correct, i end up finishing 5/6 , 5/7, or 6/7 ....
its difficult to diagnose exactly why i got it wrong...
lack of TRUE understanding of the passage/stimulus?
time pressure?
misread?
etc etc etc
Point is, i am not sure and because i am not sure i fall repeatedly into getting these 4 level and 5 level difficult questions wrong.
I feel like i am at a point where if i can just have this one last breakthrough and conquer these 4 and 5 level questions that i will be well on my way to consistently get the score i want with confidence.
Can anyone share how they overcame this temporary hurdle?
do not take the exam this Saturday, withdraw before the exam.
Hey,
I am having trouble paraphrasing/anticipating the flaw in flaw/descriptive weakening questions that do not possess the typical or cookie cutter flaws.
I read the stimulus, isolate conclusion and premises, and yet i cannot pin point what is exactly wrong with the stimulus.
Again, this is more so for the questions that do not fall under the typical flaws we see time and time again.
I should note, however, that once i get into the answer choices, i seem to do a good in applying the 2 step flaw test which leaves me to getting the answer choice correct or at the minimum , i am left with two possible AC's.
Now with respect to paraphrasing or anticipating the flaw, Is this something that some of you experience as well, or is it just me?
also, do a lot of you simply rely on the 2 step test for flaws or are you paraphrasing/ anticipating the answer choice most of the time?
thank you.
when you start a section , full timed pt, or a set 20-30 question types, and you begun to answer the VERY FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD questions of that section, pt, or drill set, that your mind feels like it is jumping all over the place and scrambling, attention is lost, comprehension is poor, and you feel as if time is moving faster than it really is?
all of the above occurs with me and i usually get 2-3 of the first 5 questions wrong, especially in a timed individual LR section.
Anyone else experience this, any remedies?
great. thanks everyone.
i was thinking about completing the curriculum but saving the drilling for the time in spent in between doing full timed practice tests.
so for example, i would complete the lessons throughout the curriculum but not do all of the question sets.
after i finish the curriculum i would take timed practice tests and in between doing the practice tests, BR the test but also drill various question types.
what do you guys and girls think?
i was wondering how far out from your scheduled testing date did you guys start taking full timed tests?
i anticipate a few more months of drilling and other exercises which i believe will leave me with 2.5 months to take prep tests 50-79. i fear 2.5 months is too little time to take the tests, review, and act accordingly.
what do you guys/girls think?
this would make the diagramming process for the LG section much, much more difficult. Looking back and forth from paper to the computer screen when diagramming (assuming you can even use paper to diagram if the test was computerized) is only one of the problems i anticipate.