I don't have great advice but I'm exactly in the same boat. I realized nearly all my mistakes are due to skimming answer choices and taking a trap AC for granted (lol a classic LSAT flaw). Sending you best wishes and let's get it done once and for all!! Feel free to inbox me if you'd like some peer support!

at the minimum, AC D does not tell us why repressors enjoy greater advantages than sensitizers do, at all!

i refuse to see urban

always missed on these questions but got more complicated ones right... how to be more alerted ughhhh

kinda unfair that Q24 and Q28 are touching on the same subtlety... i guess if you missed one you missed them both

but it also interestingly served as a reminder to check on the understanding of "starting conditions"

I feel punished for not taking biology seriously in HS. help a social science person out

distracted by A

"after it has defined and classified all possible problems..." doesn't comply with the argument that it is a constant on-going event

SA: that is enough to make the conclusion true!

NA: duh, of course!

P.S.: RIP Kobe Bryant!

Rewrite A) this way -

It takes for granted that the economic incentive is sufficient to cause such a costly project to be undertaken.

This is not a sufficient condition for the project to be undertaken/to reach the conclusion.