First of all, there's never a dumb question, we are all learning! And second, yes, that would also be a correct answer choice.
The reason why A is correct is because the Mooresiville civilian is saying they are going to make an exception and vote for an incumbent-- even though they said they were running against all of them. If everyone made the same exception as the Mooresville civilian, then there would only be incumbents re-elected. For the city council to change, most civilians would have to NOT follow the Mooriseville civilians example or method of voting.
Option A says something very similar to what you offered as a correct answer choice. Option A says that "at least some other voters in mooriseville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election", which means they would NOT be voting for the incumbent in their riding. This also translates to "some voters in moorsiville will vote for a non-incumbent in the upcoming election".
Your example suggests that at least one riding would change significantly, however, in answer choice A, it provides the possibility that many, some, or simply more than one neighbourhood's representative is changed from the election.
Hey I'm looking to score 170+ and would LOVE a Zoom study buddy!
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
First of all, there's never a dumb question, we are all learning! And second, yes, that would also be a correct answer choice.
The reason why A is correct is because the Mooresiville civilian is saying they are going to make an exception and vote for an incumbent-- even though they said they were running against all of them. If everyone made the same exception as the Mooresville civilian, then there would only be incumbents re-elected. For the city council to change, most civilians would have to NOT follow the Mooriseville civilians example or method of voting.
Option A says something very similar to what you offered as a correct answer choice. Option A says that "at least some other voters in mooriseville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election", which means they would NOT be voting for the incumbent in their riding. This also translates to "some voters in moorsiville will vote for a non-incumbent in the upcoming election".
Your example suggests that at least one riding would change significantly, however, in answer choice A, it provides the possibility that many, some, or simply more than one neighbourhood's representative is changed from the election.