Do the core curriculum in order and do as many sets as possible. It will help you understand argument structure.

yes-- this is very helpful way of putting it together.

taking the LSAT again and this is one of the areas where I really struggled to feel confident and fully understand.

PLEASE-- someone #help and correct me

Sufficient assumption: an assumption that is enough for the statement to be valid/true.

Necessary assumption: subtle, you typically take for granted and MUST exist in order for the conclusion to exist. BUT when it comes to validity, it does not need to validate the statement.

However, although theoretically i understand the concept behind it, when it comes to application i struggle and end up confusing them.

Someone please help.

i truly interpreted "far reaching" as "broad popular appeal".

what is a "limiting case"? i get it but i don't, if that makes any sense?

PS: just liek T14plssss, i thought this applied to a case study. a "selected group". i guess, a special group?

#help (Added by Admin)

how could i have possibly chosen E?! SMH.

Can someone help me define what a "general claim" is? how is a general claim an opposing opinion? wouldn't everything be an "opposing opinion"? #help

i got this question right (my hunch said A) BUT i was thrown off by the "inadequate". can someone explain how they were able to eliminate AC (C) and understood that "inadequate" did not mean "unfair". #help

this is exactly why i did not choose D... :(

if this offer is still available i would like to join please i BEG

facts. thank you

I abstained from selecting answer choice D because i felt like it was a sufficient assumption. I am still having a hard time understanding why this is a necessary...simply because it bridges two ideas?

I still don’t understand why D is wrong. If we can’t judge then we can’t prove to be true. Is D wrong simply bc it’s too strong?