You can use older PT's for sure, but only completing 8 out of the 29 new tests isn't that bad at all with the Nov exam being in roughly 5-6 weeks.

What I do to help with saving new PT's is to simulate flex for the actual PT, then taking that extra LR section to create a problem set and combine it with problem sets of an older games and reading section to create a makeshift 3 section Flex PT.

Taking october. Low 170's avg. going for mid 170s in oct. Pacific time zone

dm

Interested, thanks!

Try completely over-doing your blind review by going over EVERY question and EVERY wrong answer choice. In the notes under the question write the basic argument, write your initial thought after reading the question (essentially predicting the answer), then go through the AC's and write why every wrong AC is wrong, and why the correct one is correct. Going over the wrong one's so in depth gives you 80% more material that you're studying (4:1 ratio wrong to right). This will seem excessive and annoying, but you will start to pick up on trends that tripped you up under timed conditions, and also familiarizing yourself with very common wrong AC's.

Redo every single game that you even slightly struggled with infinitely until you can completely do it in your head (meaning moving the pieces around easily without having to write it out). Make sure you watch Jy's video's as well if you're just missing the inferences. Redoing the games plenty of times and training yourself to make it easy enough to do in your head like simple math is the best thing because it becomes engrained in your head. After you get 'X' game to be a natural instinct for you, you will notice some game that is almost exactly the same as 'X' game just with slightly different rules. Becoming that familiar with all the various patterns will save you plenty of time and guide you in the direction of the possible inferences. part of this mastery also includes working out all the wrong choices as well. every wrong choice gives you an opportunity to move around the game pieces gaining familiarity with how they move, and how they can contradict the rules, possibly also helping you pick up on patterns that'll lead to a rule break. i often notice in difficult games that a large majority of the wrong choices among all of the questions pertain to one specific rule.

Yes you can. I recommend testing out a preptest on lawhub, it's the exact same format as the flex. Very different visuals and for me it was a big deal switching from 7sage to the lawhub interface without ever seeing it before when I took the August exam, but for others it didn't matter.