User Avatar
jhsu507
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
jhsu507
Sunday, Aug 30 2020

@kashibrandi609 said:

In one of the videos JY mentions that strengthening is a super set of different LR questions, SA/PSA/NA. He said that in a sense SA/PSA/NA are strengthening. I would just err on the side of caution of thinking all NA strengthen

Totally forgot about JY's videos! Thanks!

1

In other words, does a necessary assumption of an argument strengthens the argument? For example, if a stimulus argue that environmental factors caused X instead of genetics, would an answer choice like “environmental factors can sometimes cause X,” which I think is a NA, be strengthening the argument? I honestly think it does, though not much, since it shows that the argument is possible. And if it does, do all NA strengthen it’s pertaining arguments?

0
PrepTests ·
PT128.S2.Q17
User Avatar
jhsu507
Tuesday, Jun 16 2020

Nice

0
PrepTests ·
PT18.S2.Q3
User Avatar
jhsu507
Thursday, Aug 15 2019

OH nvm I get it now, I didn't include voting against all other incumbent in the 'example'

1
PrepTests ·
PT18.S2.Q3
User Avatar
jhsu507
Thursday, Aug 15 2019

Unless the "example" was referring to voting for the one she's voting for? But in that case, how do I know what the example was referring to? I'm an ESL student and this is so confusing

1
PrepTests ·
PT18.S2.Q3
User Avatar
jhsu507
Thursday, Aug 15 2019

I don't get this one, the last part says that:

If everyone follow the example (vote for the one who represents their neighborhood) → There could be substantial change

But isn't answer choice A saying that Substantial change → /follow example , which is wrong?

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?