I have one to sell after the June LSAT! :) I think it's worth the money if you're really fighting for the absolute best score. I'm aiming for a 173+ so I got one.
For #27, were they really obstacles though? shouldn't the author have discussed that these problems are difficult to overcome in order for them to be obstacles? I see them merely as prerequisites to achieving objectivity, not necessarily obstacles... And for answer choice A, does "citing historical scholarship" mean that you cite actual works evaluating history?
What is the definition of exactly half? Is that 'some' or 'most'? Or is it neither?
Same here! Please email hyunnysoo@melinadebona917.com :)
I plan on taking the June 2014 LSAT should I not receive my ideal score on the Feb. 2014 one.
I have inadequate knowledge as to whether or not having taken the LSAT twice adversely affects my shot at getting into a good law school. Any thoughts?
Yes, yes, yes! I totally agree with you that the LSAT, going to a good law school, or even just being a lawyer should not be the end goal. It's about what kind of lawyer you want to be, what kind of difference you want to make. Thanks for sharing.
What kind of students should look at hiring a consultant or admissions help? If your scores are safely in the median/75% range, and you have a law school advisor at an Ivy League college,would you be okay without one?