I'm confused regarding the scope of the principles involved in questions like these, because I have seen a variety of how stringently the principle is applied to the answers. In this specific question I selected C because although it is not a financial risk, an inconvenience to the other library users can be interpreted as a risk per se.

Further confusion I had regarding this question was why that principle is limited to one clause when I have seen in another questions that the principle is found throughout the stimulus. I was not only looking for a risk created by a transgressor in a certain situation, but also for the fact that if the fine for that risk were not applied, a collective punishment to all non-transgressing parties of the situation (the cardholders - the library users) would be unjustifiably exacted. Could someone please explain this better with this in mind?

Please help me understand why I got number 6 wrong. I thought it was a "negate necessary condition" because "no one attended who did not rsvp" seems like it fits this. Can someone please explain the process for translating this into lawgic? Thanks!

Hello! I'm interested