What's the difference between this and a Necessary Assumption question? It seems like the way you go about choosing the answer choice is similar.

How does one not get cross-eyed with repeating words? That's why I missed this question. I didn't fully understand the answer choices because of the repeating words and syntax. How can I improve my understanding?

I still don't understand answer choice C. It's written in such a confusing manner - and encountering answer choices I can't fully grasp + the time pressure of the LSAT is my weak point. Any tips? This is frustrating.

I struggle with understanding of when to know to chain if you don't see a conditional indicator. Question 3, for example. What is supposed to trigger the mind to understand "oh! if there an opera company, then they must produce the most popular operas."?

Because when I first encountered this, I viewed it as one big condition, not embedded. I watched the "Conditionals without Indicators" video and took notes, but am still struggling a wee bit.

@LawyeRell I struggled with that, too, then I remembered that someone said you connect ideas and not just words

How are we supposed to diagram and answer this in 1 minute? Granted, conditional logic and MBT questions are my weak point, but writing all of this down quickly (and in a clear manner so we can understand it) and then filter through the answer choices seems like a time vacuum

how is A) wrong? The passage states that the academy discouraged innovation in the arts, so there was little innovation with sculpture. Since the passage also states that the academy was a major financial sponsor, there's a direct correlation between the amount of funding someone receives and their innovation, no? The painters showed a remarkable degree of innovation, thus they received more funds, thus A) would be correct...? Can someone explain where my gap in reasoning is, please?