Speculators... come one come all. What do we think, hope, pray that the curve (170) will be?
For historical purposes... and because I find myself with an abundance of time now that I am done with the beast... here are the last few curves.
PT 68 -11
PT 69 -11
PT 70 -11
PT 71 -13
PT 72 -12
I felt very strong on everything but games ( my trouble spot from the start ) but I feel they were perfectly normal. Nothing crazy as in recent past exams, I just suck at games. That said, I thought the other sections were quite normal too, maybe even a little softer, so I'm going to go with -10 as my guess. That said, I would very much relived if it turns out to be a -12 or -13...who wouldn't?
For perspective, the averages for my 5 most recent, 10 most recent, and 35 most recent PTs, were all within 1 point of each other. My individual scores were all over the board... but my averages for those groups were pretty uniform and if my guess on the curve is right, I'll do about 2 points better than my "average" thanks to strength in my non-LG sections.
Anyone else care to share?
****PLEASE DO NOT TALK ABOUT SPECIFIC QUESTIONS****
So JY's method is more from memory, so you don't have to make those marks. Some people report having tons of time left over at the end of RC (I'm not one of them!) so marking wouldn't matter for them. But for some of us, marking can take up a lot of time. Have you tried to limit what you actually mark to see if that makes a difference?
I ask because most RC errors for me came from rushing or panicking when I was clueless and sucking up a bunch of time...which led to more rushing!
If your BR score is much higher than your timed, then it's clearly a timing/confidence issue. If BR is lower too, then focusing on your comprehension and structure will definitely help.
Also, make sure you look at the types of questions you get wrong to see if there are any patterns. The RC question types are really no different than the rest of the test, so you can drill them too.