I would say the easiest way is to get perfect or near perfect on your logic games. If you get 20q right on lg, and 15 on rc, and 15 on lr, that is a raw score of 50, which should translate to 156-158.

Another piece of advice is if you aren't needing over 160, take the lsat with the intention of not finishing each section. For RC for example, forget the last passage and devote all your time to maximize your accuracy in the 3 passages and then guess all E for the last 6-7 questions. By doing so, you might be able to get 15-20 questions right. The same thing with LR, try to get at least 15/20 in the first 20 questions and perhaps you can get 1 or 2 questions right by guessing all E for the last 5 questions.

This strategy is practical advice that might be best for your specific case.

@ said:

@ What would be the best way to study using this program then to achieve this?

The most important thing is to focus on accuracy (not speed). My point was that if you feel rushed trying to tackle every single question, the chances are that you will make more errors and get less correct as opposed to answering 75% of the questions and trying to get almost perfect on those. It is much better to answer 17 questions per section and get 100% on those (17 correct), rather than answering 25 questions and getting only 50% correct (12/13 correct). In essence, you are trying to get all the "easy" questions correct and not wasting time trying to get the hardest questions correct.

My practical suggestion is to take some practice tests untimed and don't move on to the next question until you are quite certain you got the question right. If you are able to get over 160 by doing untimed tests, then you know you have the ability to solve them and that should translate to you getting at least 155 on the real-timed test.

Can someone explain why E is incorrect? It seems like the way he used logic to eliminate answer E can also be allowed to use the same logic for answer C....

#help (Added by Admin)