Mr. K is saying that those who have complained about his roofing company are biased. The author's argument is claiming those who disagree with K could still be treated badly, so really it's Mr. K who is just mean. As a result, the author concludes that Mr. K's claim is completely false.
The conclusion is extreme compared to the support. Essentially, it's saying that Mr. K's argument is false because regardless of the political outlook of the complainants, Mr. K will still be a bully. But what if it's the complete opposite? Maybe Mr. K is actually nice. The argument is attempting to weaken Mr. K's claim but then treating it as if Mr. K's argument is completely wrecked.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Mr. K is saying that those who have complained about his roofing company are biased. The author's argument is claiming those who disagree with K could still be treated badly, so really it's Mr. K who is just mean. As a result, the author concludes that Mr. K's claim is completely false.
The conclusion is extreme compared to the support. Essentially, it's saying that Mr. K's argument is false because regardless of the political outlook of the complainants, Mr. K will still be a bully. But what if it's the complete opposite? Maybe Mr. K is actually nice. The argument is attempting to weaken Mr. K's claim but then treating it as if Mr. K's argument is completely wrecked.